Togal.AI pricing: $299 per user per month, billed yearly (checked October 2026)

How this page was prepared: CyanBuild publishes this page and is one of the products discussed. The product facts below come from the linked vendor pages, each checked on October 29, 2026. No controlled, independent benchmark of these products was run for this page. The order is a reading order, not an accuracy or speed ranking, and published prices change — verify the current terms before you buy.

The price Togal.AI publishes

Togal.AI is one of the more transparent vendors in this category: the pricing page names the plans, states the price, states the billing unit, and lists what is included. That transparency is worth something on its own, because several competitors in the same table publish nothing at all.

Togal.AI published plans (checked October 29, 2026). The plan figures were read verbatim from togal.ai/pricing on October 29, 2026, and the trial terms from the vendor's own signup page at app.togal.ai. The Business price is published only as the word Custom; no dollar amount exists on the page and none is inferred here. The price renders as $299/mo with no currency code, so the currency is not stated by the vendor.

Two details in that table deserve emphasis because they are easy to misread. First, unlimited automated takeoffs is the vendor's own phrase, listed as the first bullet under Growth. The vendor publishes no definition, no sheet cap and no project cap for it, so it should not be expanded into a specific allowance. Second, the Business tier is published only as the word Custom. No dollar amount exists on the page, so any number for it is an estimate and not a vendor price.

What Togal.AI claims, and what it does not substantiate

Togal.AI markets an accuracy figure prominently. The homepage says the tool is built “to automatically detect, measure, and compare directly from your drawings — with up to 98% accuracy”, and a stat tile reads “98% accuracy on floor plans”. The FAQ says “Togal can automate project takeoffs with 98% accuracy” and adds that the AI learns from corrections made and gets better over time.

No test protocol, dataset, margin of error or independent audit accompanies that figure. The only third-party study the vendor cites is a University of Kansas speed test reporting 76% faster than On-Screen Takeoff — a speed comparison, not an accuracy one, and no report is linked from the site. So the honest reading is: 98% is Togal's own claim, stated in its own words, and it should be treated the same way you would treat any vendor accuracy claim, namely as something to test on your own drawing rather than as a settled measurement.

The speed claims are the same shape. The homepage says takeoff is 5x faster and the FAQ says the tool can eliminate as much as 80% of the manual takeoff process. Neither figure carries a published method.

Where Togal.AI fits in the workflow

The vendor's own feature pages describe the workflow: upload a drawing, run the Togal button to detect, measure and count, use AI search across the image and text, and then export the quantities into your own estimating software or Excel. Supported formats are PDF, JPEG, PNG and TIFF. Collaboration is real-time in the cloud, and the FAQ states you can invite people outside your organisation to collaborate on takeoffs without them having a subscription.

Two things are worth checking. On security, the vendor has published a SOC 2 Type II compliance announcement and a blog post stating that its systems and processes have been independently audited over time, and it markets the certification on its comparison pages — so ask for the report rather than accepting the badge. On integrations, named partners are published as press releases rather than as a directory: Ediphi, which takes Togal quantities into a preconstruction estimate, and eTakeoff, which resells Togal as a Dimension add-on. The API itself is available only by contacting the vendor.

Published prices of comparable takeoff tools

The table below places Togal's published price beside its peers, each read on that vendor's own page on October 29, 2026. It is a reference table, not a ranking: the units differ deliberately and cannot be divided into one another.

Published prices of comparable takeoff tools (checked October 29, 2026). Every figure was read on the vendor's own pricing or buy page on October 29, 2026. Where a vendor publishes no price, that is recorded rather than estimated. The units are deliberately not converted: a per-seat annual price, a per-user monthly price and a per-trade annual licence are different things, and a monthly PDF page allowance measures capacity rather than a seat. On-Screen Takeoff and ConstructConnect Takeoff are separate products: the legacy desktop On-Screen Takeoff publishes no price, while the newer browser-based ConstructConnect Takeoff does.

Read the units, not the numbers. A per-seat annual licence is a person's year of access. A per-user monthly price billed annually is an instalment on an annual commitment, not a month you can buy. A per-company price has no denominator at all. A per-trade annual licence is sized by trade and volume rather than by seat. And a monthly PDF page allowance measures processing capacity, not licensing. Two vendors charging $299 do not cost the same, and no vendor in this table publishes a figure in the same unit as another.

What to ask before you buy

• What does the Business tier actually cost for my team size, and is that figure per user or per company?
• What is the cancellation notice period, and does the $299 rate lock for the first year or can it change at renewal?
• What does “unlimited automated takeoffs” mean in practice — is there a sheet or project ceiling you have not published?
• Can you share the protocol behind the 98% figure, including the drawing types and the measured quantity definition?
• Which exports do I need, and does the Excel export carry the fields my estimating software expects?

To run the same comparison across the category, read what Countfire does not publish and how PlanSwift's annual price works. For the feature-level view of Togal against CyanBuild, see CyanBuild vs Togal.AI.